News and Currents
Locals are in revolt against Puget Sound Energy
From crosscut.com, an online Seattle publication, Aug. 4:
With Washington's biggest utility about to be bought by foreigners,
public power advocates in four counties are hoping to switch their
portions of the grid to local control. Voters will decide in November.
By Bob Simmons
"I'm not afraid of foreigners," a Skagit County resident
told Public Utility District commissioners in Mount Vernon, Wash.,
last Tuesday, July 29. "Some of my best friends are foreigners.
It's just this particular foreigner I'm afraid of."
The "particular foreigner" is the Macquarie Group of
Australia, which wants to buy out Puget Sound Energy, Washington's
oldest and biggest utility. The proposed takeover, which PSE consistently
describes as a merger, has given new life to latent authority and
ambition within public utility districts (PUDs) north and west of
Seattle. The PUDs are positioning themselves for an attempted takeover
of PSE assets in Skagit, Jefferson, and Whatcom counties and on
Whidbey Island in Island County. Both sides in the coming public
power fights turned up the rhetorical energy last week.
"The devil is in the details," warned Gretchen Aliabadi,
a spokesperson for PSE, "and there are lots of layers to this
onion."
Aliabadi made it clear that her company will do whatever it can
to defeat any proposed PUD move on its service area. "We're
trying to protect our customers from making a bad decision without
knowing all the facts," she said, referring to public questions
on the ballot in November.
Dean Boyer, a spokesperson for the Washington Public Utility Districts
Association, puts it this way: "Who do you want controlling
your electricity, the local commissioners you elect, who live in
your neighborhood, or the officers of a private company controlled
by a bank on the other side of the world?"
At last week's meeting, all three commissioners of the Skagit County
Public Utility District voted to ask the county's electorate in
November if they want their water-serving PUD to go into the electric
power business. D. Hittle & Associates, an energy consultant
hired by the district, concluded earlier this year that the move
makes sense for Skagit PUD and its potential 59,500 power consumers.
Jefferson County voters will decide in November whether to have
their PUD go after PSE's assets and electrical customers in Port
Townsend and other portions of the county. And a grassroots organization
on Whidbey Island has gathered enough signatures to ask the Island's
voters to form a PUD for the express purpose of taking over PSE's
Whidbey operations.
Just to the north, commissioners of the Whatcom County Public Utility
District are pondering a move to take over much of PSE's service
in that county. Since they're already in the business (they have
one electricity customer, the Conoco-Phillips refinery at Cherry
point north of Bellingham), Whatcom faces a less complicated process
than the other three. No public vote is required the Whatcom
PUD commissioners will decide whether to go after PSE's operations
in Bellingham and elsewhere in the county.
Although the PUDs have the authority to buy or condemn the assets
of privately owned utilities, it hasn't happened in decades. Assuming
the voters approve the venture in Skagit or Jefferson counties,
or formation of the new PUD on Whidbey Island, their commissioners
and those of the Whatcom PUD may still conclude that this windmill
is too big to tilt.
Talking with reporters, PSE's Gretchen Aliabadi stresses the company's
size and clout. "We're not huge in comparison to Consolidated
Edison and some of the other national giants, but we're big enough
to bring such things as green power and conservation to the area.
Those are expensive, but with our buying power we can do it. How's
a little PUD with 19,000 subscribers [meaning Jefferson County]
going to spend hundreds of millions on a wind farm?"
The obvious answer is that they can't. The not-so-obvious answer
is that they don't have to. Jefferson PUD counts on hooking up to
the Bonneville Power Administration for a segment of BPA's limited
power supply that's set aside for new, small PUDs. Whidbey Island
would be similarly entitled. Skagit would try to condemn PSE's power
dams on the Baker River. The PUDs will, however, need to meet the
state requirement that 15 percent of their power come from renewable
sources, not counting hydroelectric power, and that could prove
challenging in the start-up years.
In the 70 years-plus since the Washington legislature gave public
utility districts the authority to buy all or parts of a privately
owned utility and serve its consumers, Washington has become one
of the leading PUD states in the country. There are now 28 PUDs
here, and 23 of them provide electricity. To get into the electric
business, they need only the approval of a majority of the voters
in the service area. The four incipient raiders of North Puget Sound
believe their chances increased markedly with PSE's publicized eagerness
to be swallowed up by foreign investors.
However much fun the fall campaigns may be, the PUD's don't get
to play. Once the takeover question's been sent to the ballot, the
PUD commissioners and their staff are required to stay out of the
campaign and leave the politicking to citizen groups. PSE is not
so constrained. It will spend whatever it can to defeat the public
power initiatives. It's unclear whether the company's shareholders
will absorb the advertising and campaign costs, or if those can
be recovered from ratepayers as a business expense.
Even if it loses at the polls, don't expect PSE to accept any PUD's
best offer for the transmission lines, substations, and power generation
assets. Those transactions will live or die in court, in condemnation
proceedings. Each PUD will need to fund a condemnation suit and
convince a judge that it's making a reasonable offer for a piece
of PSE's massive infrastructure.
The PUDs can sell taxable revenue bonds for buying the assets,
and if they succeed they're allowed to sell general obligation bonds
whose dividends are exempt from federal income tax
to pay operating expenses not covered by revenue from power sales.
They're exempt from property tax but generally pay a so-called privilege
tax, roughly equal to what privately owned companies would pay in
property assessments.
There's no profit margin in PUD operations, a point the public
power advocates will try to drive home during the fall campaigns.
For this reason, they conclude, the PUD is bound to save consumers
money over the long term. For example, the Skagit PUD's consultant
says the PUD could be selling electricity for 9.3 cents per kilowatt
hour by 2010 and estimates the cost for PSE power to be 9.5 cents
in that same year. Based on those guesses, the new PUD could save
its ratepayers $182 million in the first 10 years of operation,
even with the huge cost of buying PSE's hardware.
PSE's Gretchen Aliabadi thinks the Skagit PUD's consultant figures
are absurd. "For example, they value our Skagit County substations
at only $8 million, when their replacement cost is at least $40
million," she says. "We just hope our customers won't
vote without reading their reports."
If the consultant's appraisal figures are way off, it's PSE's fault,
according to Skagit PUD Commissioner Jim Cook. "Early on they
agreed to give us basic information on the value of their dams and
substations, and everything. But when we got serious about it they
suddenly slammed the door. We've done the best we could do [in appraising
the assets] from every source we could find. We could have done
a lot better if they'd talked to us."
Cook, a retired logger who manages his own timberlands, finds the
work involved in this phase of a PUD commissioner's life to be more
than daunting. "It's like going fishing for trout and suddenly
you've hooked a whale," he observed. "You've got it hooked,
but how on earth you gonna get it in the boat?"
§ Bob Simmons is a freelance writer and former KING-TV journalist
living in Bellingham, Wash. You can reach him in care of editor@crosscut.com.
|